DPPP:
Dynamic Programmatic Product Placement
a new win-win category of programmatic advertising for streaming services
Abstract
The streaming industry is grappling with an existential challenge due to a saturated market, affordability pressures, and high churn rates driven by consumer behavior. Viewers are overwhelmed by the number of available streaming platforms and often end up subscribing to multiple services, which leads to frustration over costs and a fragmented experience. Current pricing models—such as AVOD, SVOD, and hybrid approaches—fail to address these issues without compromising either affordability or user experience. This white paper delves into the industry's challenges, leveraging data and insights into consumer behavior.
I propose a new concept of Dynamic Programmatic Product Placement (DPPP) that preserves narrative integrity, is brand-safe, opens up new revenue models, and doesn't interrupt the viewing experience.
Table of Contents
Problem Statement: Industry Challenges and Consumer Behavior
Current Solutions: Unsatisfactory Pricing Models
Real-time AI-driven Product Placement: Object Classification and Segmentation
Dynamic Programmatic Product Placement (DPPP): A New AVOD Model
Conclusion and the Ask
Produced with NotebookLM by Google
Problem Statement: Industry Challenges and Consumer Behavior
Problem Statement
The streaming industry is currently at a critical crossroads, with consumers feeling overwhelmed by the numerous available platforms. Many end up subscribing to multiple services, leading to significant cost burdens. This trend has led to growing frustration, with users increasingly feeling they must pay more to access their preferred content. The landscape has become oversaturated, and viewers are juggling more subscriptions than ever. Subscription fatigue is a natural and immediate cap to revenue growth, demanding immediate attention and action.
This consumer behavior is not just a trend but a significant factor affecting the profitability model of streaming platforms, underscoring the need for a consumer-centric approach in the industry's strategies:
-
High Content Costs: A significant portion of streaming platforms' expenses goes to content acquisition, licensing, and production, which accounts for about 45% of profitability challenges. Platforms must spend heavily to attract and retain subscribers, especially with fierce competition for exclusive content. This high cost of content not only affects the bottom line but limits the platforms' ability to invest in other areas, such as improving user experience or developing new features. It's a clear indicator of the need for cost-effective content strategies. Source: Financial reports from Netflix and Disney+ (2022)
-
Subscriber Churn: With so many platforms, 15% of the industry's profitability issues can be attributed to churn. Users frequently switch platforms or unsubscribe altogether due to dissatisfaction with pricing, content variety, or overall value. Source: Deloitte's Digital Media Trends Survey (2022)
-
Market Saturation: The market is highly saturated with numerous streaming options available to consumers. 20% of profitability concerns stem from saturation, which makes it increasingly difficult for new platforms to gain traction and for existing platforms to retain their user bases. Source: PwC Market Analysis (2022)
-
Operational Costs: Managing platform infrastructure, employee salaries, and technological maintenance contributes 10% to profitability issues. Source: Statista Operational Costs Data (2021)
-
International Expansion: While crucial for growth, international expansion presents numerous challenges, from localization to navigating regulations, which account for another 10% of profitability concerns. Source: McKinsey Global Expansion Report (2021)
Consumer Behavior Insights and Their Influence
In addition to profitability factors, consumer preferences significantly impact streaming platforms' ability to grow sustainably. Users are increasingly driven by content value, affordability, and their tolerance for advertising or subscription fatigue. These preferences often determine whether consumers stay loyal to a platform or churn, directly influencing market share and profitability.
Factors influencing User Preferences
-
Content Value: High-quality content is crucial for user satisfaction and retention, based on user surveys, accounts for 40%. Source: Nielsen Survey on Content Value (2021)
-
Affordability: Competitive pricing significantly affects user retention, especially for price-sensitive users, accounting for 35%. Source: Kantar Affordability Insights (2022)
-
Subscription Fatigue: Consumers are overwhelmed by the number of services they subscribe to, leading to cancellations accounting for 25%. Source: Deloitte’s Digital Media Trends Survey (2022)
Current Solutions: Unsatisfactory Pricing Models
User Experience as Proxy of Content Value
Advertising breaks interrupt the streaming experience, diminishing the overall perceived value. None of the current pricing models delivers a satisfactory value to the customer.
-
SVOD (Subscription Video on Demand):
-
High user experience: Ad-free viewing, premium content, seamless interface.
-
Low affordability: High subscription costs, especially when subscribing to multiple services.
-
-
AVOD (Ad-Supported Video on Demand):
-
High affordability: Free or low-cost with ads.
-
Low user experience: Ad interruptions and less personalized viewing experience.
-
-
Hybrid (AVOD + SVOD):
-
Moderate user experience: Allows users to choose between ad-supported and ad-free options.
-
Moderate affordability: Pricing varies but is generally less expensive than pure SVOD models.
-
Real-time AI-driven Product Placement: Object Classification and Segmentation
A Quick Note on the Applied AI
As the streaming industry evolves, the role of technology, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), becomes increasingly significant. This section provides a quick Overview of some AI concepts and their potential applications in the streaming industry.
Object Classification
Definition: Identifying and categorizing objects within an image into predefined classes.
-
Goal: To assign a label (or class) to the entire image or specific objects in the image.
-
Example Use Cases:
-
Classifying an image as containing a "cat" or "dog."
-
Identifying specific items in a retail image, e.g., "laptop," "phone," or "tablet."
-
Object Segmentation
Definition: Dividing an image into regions by identifying the boundaries of objects and categorizing each pixel.
-
Goal: To classify each pixel in an image and group them into meaningful parts (e.g., foreground objects and background).
Types of Segmentation:
-
Semantic Segmentation:
-
Groups all pixels belonging to the same class without distinguishing between different instances.
-
Example: All pixels of a "car" in an image are grouped, regardless of whether there are multiple cars.
-
-
Instance Segmentation:
-
Differentiates between individual instances of the same object class.
-
Example: Identifying three cars in an image as distinct objects.
-
-
Panoptic Segmentation:
-
Combines both semantic and instance segmentation to provide a comprehensive understanding of the image.
-
Example: Classifying every pixel while distinguishing between individual instances and the background.
-
Example Use Cases:
-
Autonomous vehicles: Identifying roads, pedestrians, and cars.
-
Medical imaging: Segmenting organs or tumors in X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs.
-
Augmented reality: Overlaying digital content on specific objects in a real-world scene.
The Opportunity offered by AI
AI can identify and replace objects in videos, making entire product categories available for real-time 'rebranding' for hyper-targeted product placement based on the user's log-in marketing profile. Combined with Programmatic Advertising, this AI capability opens the door to a new win-win model for streaming platforms and consumers. It transforms the media content into a never-ending monetizing opportunity, allowing platforms to generate revenue without compromising user experience.
Dynamic Programmatic Product Placement (DPPP): A New AVOD Model
Dynamic Programmatic Product Placement (DPPP): is a new category of AVOD that provides affordability without interrupting the viewing experience.
-
Dynamic Product Placement: In movies or TV series, instead of fixed product placements, products are dynamically inserted based on the target audience. For example, a coffee cup in a scene might display Starbucks or Peet's Coffee, depending on who is watching and their preferences. This kind of dynamic product placement allows brands to better target their audiences while keeping the viewing experience seamless.
-
Programmatic Auction: Similar to programmatic advertising, the product placement opportunities in a film can be auctioned in real time. Brands can bid for the segments available in the content, ensuring their products reach the right audience effectively.
-
Fixed vs. Dynamic Placement: Product placements would be fixed for theater releases but become dynamic for streaming releases, adapting to different audiences. This way, the movie experience in theaters retains its artistic integrity, while streaming content becomes adaptable and personalized.
-
Upfronts for Segment Space: During upfronts, brands could bet on segments—placement opportunities within shows or movies. This works like an ad inventory auction but in a creative context, allowing brands to secure prime placement opportunities.
-
Capping and Product Exclusion: To maintain a consistent viewing experience, there would be "capping on frequency" —e.g., once a Starbucks cup is displayed in a scene, that brand will remain consistent throughout for that character. There is also a limit on the number of product categories that can appear, preventing cluttered product placements.
-
Autogenerated vs. Writer-Established Segments: Segments can be either AI-generated based on audience data or pre-established by writers or storyboarders. Directors may have control over which brands are featured, and they may blacklist brands that do not align with the artistic vision of the content. New storyboarding software may be developed to offer inventory.
Conclusion and the Ask
Dynamic Product Placement (DPPP) represents more than just an innovation in advertising—it signals the birth of a new industry segment within the streaming ecosystem. By seamlessly integrating targeted, context-aware product placements into content, DPPP creates a
win-win-win-win solution:
-
Viewers enjoy affordable, uninterrupted experiences.
-
Advertisers gain brand-safe, precision-targeted exposure.
-
Streaming platforms unlock a scalable revenue stream beyond traditional subscription and ad models.
-
Filmmakers retain control over their content.
This approach introduces a hybrid model that combines the best features of AVOD and SVOD. Ultimately, DPPP is not just a feature—it is the foundation for a new category of immersive, audience-first monetization that could redefine the economic framework of digital content delivery.
What could go wrong? AI technology will be a challenge, but we're up to the task. The Programmatic Platform is extensive, but it's an existing technology. The human component will be the most challenging. Including filmmakers and consumers in the process will be fundamental to addressing concerns about preserving creative content and user privacy. Including the human component, from both the creative and consumer sides, is a must-have for the initial MVP.
* * *
The Ask: a project of this magnitude requires significant resources.
It's about building a private ad exchange with DSP and SSP capabilities, leveraging AI to provide a seamless user experience, and investing considerable PR effort in building collaboration with filmmakers.
Being first to market is critical as it will allow the platform to serve as infrastructure for the rest of the streaming platforms.
I am looking to join a tech or media company with the resources to build and commercialize this idea.
Appendix
* APPENDIX 1 - MVP COST *
Team and Resources for the MVP
1. Development Team
-
AI/ML Engineers (2-3):
-
Build a prototype for contextual scene detection and ad matching.
-
-
Backend Engineers (2-3):
-
Develop the basic ad exchange and programmatic bidding system.
-
-
Frontend Developers (2):
-
Create minimal interfaces for the DSP, SSP, and creative approval tool.
-
-
DevOps Engineer (1):
-
Set up cloud infrastructure for scalable deployment.
-
2. Data and Annotation
-
Annotation Team (1-2 people):
-
Label scenes in pilot content for ad placement opportunities.
-
-
Data Engineer (1):
-
Build a pipeline for audience data collection and basic targeting.
-
3. Partnerships
-
Pilot Content:
-
Negotiate with one or two smaller studios or streaming platforms for limited content licensing (e.g., a single TV show or movie).
-
4. Design Thinking
-
Design Thinking Facilitator (1):
-
Run workshops with filmmakers to ensure the system aligns with creative expectations.
-
-
UX Designer (1):
-
Create minimal but functional interfaces for filmmakers, advertisers, and studios.
-
5. Legal and Compliance
-
Legal Consultant:
-
Draft agreements with pilot partners and ensure regulatory compliance for ad targeting.
-
Total MVP Cost$2M–$3.4M
Timeline for the MVP
-
Development and Setup: 6-9 months.
-
Pilot Testing: 3-6 months with real users and content.
Deliverables
-
Working prototype of dynamic ad placement integrated into a pilot content platform.
-
Basic programmatic ad platform (DSP, SSP, Ad Exchange).
-
Filmmaker approval tool for creatives to control ad placements.
-
Results and feedback from pilot testing.
* APPENDIX 2 - PROJECT COST *
Full Project Key Components and Costs
-
Core Development Resources:
-
Team: AI/ML engineers, software developers, data engineers, cloud/DevOps specialists.
-
Purpose: Build foundational DPPP technology for dynamic ad placement.
-
Cost: $5M–$7M/year.
-
-
Content Partnerships:
-
Purpose: Secure collaborations with studios and streaming platforms to test and deploy DPPP.
-
Cost: $2M–$5M.
-
-
Technology Infrastructure:
-
Purpose: Power AI training, real-time bidding, and video processing.
-
Cost: $2M–$4M/year.
-
-
AI Development and Expansion:
-
Team: Expanded AI/ML engineers, data scientists, and annotation teams.
-
Purpose: Build cutting-edge algorithms for contextual ad insertion and audience targeting.
-
Cost: $5M–$8M/year.
-
-
Design Thinking Team:
-
Team: Design facilitators, UX designers, and creative consultants.
-
Purpose: Ensure alignment with filmmakers and preserve artistic integrity.
-
Cost: $2M–$3M/year.
-
-
Public Relations (PR) Team:
-
Team: PR managers, industry specialists, and media outreach specialists.
-
Purpose: Reassure stakeholders, manage perception, and build trust.
-
Cost: $2M–$3M/year.
-
-
Programmatic Ad Platform:
-
Components: Ad Exchange, DSP for advertisers, SSP for filmmakers/studios.
-
Purpose: Provide a marketplace for dynamic ad placements and inventory management.
-
Cost: $10M–$15M.
-
-
Test Program:
-
Purpose: Test DPPP with streaming platforms on a small scale.
-
Cost: $2M–$3M.
-
-
Marketing and Sales:
-
Team: Marketing and sales specialists.
-
Purpose: Educate advertisers, onboard partners, and drive adoption.
-
Cost: $2M–$4M/year.
-
-
Legal and Compliance:
-
Purpose: File patents, negotiate contracts, and ensure regulatory compliance.
-
Cost: $1M–$2M.
-
-
Miscellaneous Costs:
-
Purpose: Training, onboarding, and contingencies.
-
Cost: $1M–$2M.
-
Total First-Year Budget
-
Estimate: $34M–$56M.
* APPENDIX 3 - REVENUE *
To estimate revenue, we’ll break it into components based on key stakeholders and use industry benchmarks for advertising. Dynamic Programmatic Product Placement (DPPP) has two primary revenue streams:
-
Ad Revenue:
-
Generated from dynamic product placements auctioned in real time.
-
-
Platform Fees:
-
A percentage commission on transactions facilitated through the ad exchange (DSP/SSP).
-
Revenue Formula
Revenue = (Ad Inventory × Fill Rate × CPM × Impressions) + Platform Commission
Key Assumptions for Estimation
-
Ad Inventory:
-
A typical streaming platform releases ~500 hours of content/year.
-
Assume 5 product placement opportunities per hour of content for DPPP (conservative estimate).
-
-
Fill Rate:
-
Percentage of available ad inventory sold.
-
Industry average: 60%–80%.
-
-
CPM (Cost per Thousand Impressions):
-
Industry benchmark: $20–$50 for premium placements.
-
Assume DPPP generates higher CPM due to targeted, immersive placements.
-
-
Impressions:
-
Average impressions per content (viewers watching a movie or episode).
-
Estimate 10M–50M impressions/year for a pilot phase on a mid-sized platform.
-
-
Platform Commission:
-
Percentage of revenue retained by DPPP for facilitating transactions.
-
Industry benchmark: 15%–30%.
-
Revenue Scenarios
Scenario 1: Small Pilot Phase
-
Ad Inventory: 100 hours of content/year (pilot phase).
-
Opportunities: 500 placements (5 per hour).
-
Fill Rate: 60%.
-
CPM: $20.
-
Impressions: 10M/year.
-
Platform Commission: 20%.
Ad Revenue = (500 × 60% × $20 × 10,000) = $6M/year.
Platform Revenue = $6M × 20% = $1.2M/year.
Total Revenue (Pilot): $7.2M/year.
Scenario 2: Mid-Sized Platform
-
Ad Inventory: 500 hours of content/year.
-
Opportunities: 2,500 placements.
-
Fill Rate: 70%.
-
CPM: $30.
-
Impressions: 50M/year.
-
Platform Commission: 25%.
Ad Revenue = (2,500 × 70% × $30 × 50,000) = $26.25M/year.
Platform Revenue = $26.25M × 25% = $6.56M/year.
Total Revenue (Mid-Sized Platform): $32.81M/year.
Scenario 3: Large Platform (e.g., Netflix, Disney+)
-
Ad Inventory: 5,000 hours of content/year.
-
Opportunities: 25,000 placements.
-
Fill Rate: 80%.
-
CPM: $50.
-
Impressions: 500M/year.
-
Platform Commission: 30%.
Ad Revenue = (25,000 × 80% × $50 × 500) = $500M/year.
Platform Revenue = $500M × 30% = $150M/year.
Total Revenue (Large Platform): $650M/year.